The Taming of the Shrew Psychological Masks - 918 Words

In the play, The Taming of the Shrew, by William Shakespeare, there is a recurring theme of people hiding their real identity. First, there are cases of deception, such as Tranio pretending to be Lucentio, Lucentio pretending to be a Latin tutor, Hortensio pretending to be a music tutor. More complex than these obvious examples of deception are Shakespeare’s clever uses of psychological masks. Several characters in the play take on roles that do not agree with their personalities. The psychological masks that they wear are not immediately apparent to the audience, or even to the characters themselves, until they are unmasked through the course of the play. Shakespeare mostly uses this device with the characters of Katherina, Bianca,†¦show more content†¦Petruchio wears the psychological mask of a guy who only has eyes for money. He makes his mask clear to the reader when he tells Hortensio to â€Å"wife wealthily† adding â€Å"you don’t know the p ower of gold.† after being told about Katherina’s bad behavior, not to mention her temper. It appears that Petruchio marries Kate for her money, but immediately starts to â€Å"kill her with kindness†. He begins going so by depriving her of food and sleep because he claims that neither the food from the kitchen nor the bed is good enough for her. Petruchio puts on a show of bad temper towards his servants for every fault, showing Kate what it is like to live with a bad-tempered person. For the first time in her life, Kate finds herself trying to get someone else to control their anger. Petruchio also shows Kate that she will get the things she wants when she learns to agree with what her husband says. By treating Kate in this manner, Petruchio seems cruel, but there is a reason for it. If he were truly interested only in money, he could have left Kate at home and gone out on his own. In the end, his efforts to improve his wife have worked. He improves Ka te’s life, so that she does not continue to live an unhappy life. Because of Petruchio, Katherina the shrew is happily married in the end, and comes to be a good example toShow MoreRelated The Relationship Between Katherine and Bianca in The Taming of the Shrew1186 Words   |  5 PagesThe Relationship Between Katherine and Bianca in The Taming of the Shrew   Ã‚   William Shakespeare is considered the greatest playwright of all time.   His gift for developing characters is one major aspect that accounts for this lofty acknowledgement.   Shakespeare created various characters from drunks and fools to kings and generals.   The characters are so human and so real that the audience can see aspects of their own personalities represented on stage for better or worse.   InadvertentlyRead Morewisdom,humor and faith19596 Words   |  79 PagesChesterton, Niebuhr, and Auden 27 Conclusion 34 Copyright  © 2011 by Walter G. Moss WISDOM, HUMOR, AND FAITH: A HISTORICAL VIEW â€Å"And frame your mind to mirth and merriment, / Which bars a thousand harms and lengthens life.† Shakespeare, The Taming of the Shrew, Induction, Scene 2. â€Å"Laughter without a tinge of philosophy is but a sneeze of humor. Genuine humor is replete with wisdom.† Mark Twain, quoted in Opie Percival Read, Mark Twain and I (1940), 17. â€Å"Humor offers both a form of wisdom and

Compare the Different Views of War in the Poems ‘Dulce Et...

In this essay I will be comparing the two poems, ‘The Man He Killed’ by Thomas Hardy and ‘Dulce Et Decorum Est’ by Wilfred Owen. ‘The Man He Killed’ is about a man who was in the war and is thinking about his memories in the war. The main part of his experience in the war that he is reminiscing is the killing that he committed and the majority of the poem is focused on that. Thomas Hardy did not go to war himself but it could be thought that he got the idea from a friends experience in the war. The poem is based on the Boer War. The message of the poem is that he was most probably very similar to the man he killed, as in not really knowing what they’re fighting for and why they’re there. ‘Dulce Et Decorum Est’ is about someone who is†¦show more content†¦These two poems are both still popular in the twenty-first century, which may be because of the fact they are not aimed at a single war, the can both be relat ed to any war that has gone on or that is currently going on in the twenty-first century. Some of the themes from the poems are similar, such as the obvious war and death, but the main theme and message is different. ‘Dulce Et Decorum Est’ focuses more at patriotism and how war actually affects soldiers. ‘The Man He Killed’ looks past politics and the rules that we should hate our enemies, and shows them from a human perspective. Thomas Hardy’s poem which suggests that even though they’re fighting for the opposing country, they are still the same in some sense, can be backed up by the example of when in 1914 the English and German soldiers put down their guns and played football together. Hardy’s poem is a statement that people who actually fight in wars should not be fighting. As, in fact, if they were to meet in different circumstances they would have been friends. This is shown in the poem when it says ‘you’d shoot a fellow down... if you met where any bar is, you’d help to half a crown.’ This qu ote is saying how strange it is that you would kill a man, who in any other circumstances, you would probably get along with. The tone of ‘The Man He Killed’ is of guilt, confusion and regret. He is disappointed and angry at himself for what he had done. On the other hand the tone of ‘Dulce

Tax residency of Sam for the year FY2015 and FY2016 Free Sample

Questions: 1.Is Sam an Australian Resident for the Income Tax years ending 30 June 2015 and 30 June 2016? Give reasons. 2.Advise Sam Whether the Income he receives will be Assessable in Australia during these tax years. Answers: 1.Issue The core issue in the given case is to determine the tax residency of Sam for the year FY2015 and FY2016 taking into consideration the various facts given. Rule The relevant statute that deals with the subject of tax residency is Section 6(1), ITAA 1936. It specifies various tests that may be deployed in order to determine the tax residency status of the taxpayer under question. These tests have also been enumerated in TR98/17 (CCH, 2013). The importance of determining tax residency lies in the fact that differential tax norms tend to be applicable for the Australian tax resident and Foreign tax resident in line with section 6-5(2) and 6-5(3), ITAA 1997 (Barkoczy, 2015). The various residency tests that may be used for individual taxpayer tax residency status are highlighted below (Nethercott, Richardson, and and Devos, 2016). Superannuation Test 183 days Test Reside Test Domicile Test The taxpayer needs to satisfy only one of the tests mentioned above so as to be categorised as the Australian tax resident. It is imperative to note that there are certain conditions associated with each of the tests listed above that limit their application. For Australian domicile holders, the relevant test for tax residency is the domicile test which would be discussed in detail here (Sadiq et. al., 2016). In accordance with the domicile test, tax residency is granted on the fulfilment of both the below stated conditions (Gilders et. al., 2016). The given taxpayer must have a valid domicile of Australia as per Domicile Act 1982 It is essential that the permanent abode or permanent residence of the concerned individual should be located within Australia. While, the first condition is rather easy to check in an objective manner, but there is considerable subjectivity with regards to determination of place of permanent residence. In this regards, IT 2650 may be useful as it highlights the critical factors that the Tax Commissioner is likely to consider for determining the place of permanent abode. These are mentioned below (ATO, 1991). Deviation of the actual stay period in a foreign location in comparison with the intended stay period. Presence or absence of intention on taxpayers part to come back to Australia Act of setting up a home in a foreign location Abandonment of the Australian residence Amount of time for which the taxpayer is present in foreign location and the visits to Australia during that period Extent of association that the given taxpayer maintains in Australia while residing in foreign location A relevant case which merits discussion is the F.C. of T. v. Applegate (1979) ATC 4307 case. In this case, an Australian domicile holder was sent abroad for professional purposes and the duration of foreign stay was indefinite. However, it is known that eventually after his task was over, he would return back to Australia. But, the taxpayer had to return permanently to Australia after two years due to illness. In the given case, the honourable court opined that the taxpayer would be treated as a non-Australian tax resident even though eventually he would have returned to Australia. It was also highlighted that the word permanent does not imply indefinitely but rather a substantial length. Similar stance was assumed in the F.C. of T. v. Jenkins 82 ATC 4098; (1982) 12 ATR 745 case (Deutsch et. al., 2015). Application Based on the above discussion and the given facts, Sam would be treated as a foreign tax resident for FY2015 and FY2016 because of the following reasons. The duration of stay in Italy is not definite and Sam hopes to extend his stay as he wishes to extend his contract with the Inter Milan ream based in Italy. This clearly reflects that Sam had intention to stay for a long time in Italy which could have spanned multiple years. As a result, he had even set up a bank account in Italy which also hints toward the same. Despite Sam having the intention to return to Australia eventually, the arguments of the C. of T. v. Applegate (1979) ATC 4307 would be applicable in this case. Even though Sam has returned in May 2016, but the same is because of the injury and end of soccer career and not voluntarily. Thus, taking into consideration the various case laws discussed above, it is apparent that the permanent abode for Sam during the two years was in Italy. Hence, he fails to satisfy the domicile test for either year. 2.Issue The central issue is to determine if the income received by Sam during his stay in Italy would be taxable in Australia or not. Rule As per Section 6-5(2), if the given taxpayer is classified as a tax resident of Australia, then income derived from both foreign and domestic sources would contribute to the assessable income. However, the treatment is different for foreign tax residents, which is highlighted in v Section 6-5(3) (CCH, 2013). In accordance with Section 6-5(3), for foreign tax residents, only the income derived from sources located within the territorial boundaries of Australia would contribute to assessable income in Australia. Thus, any foreign income derived by a foreign tax resident would not be assessable or taxed in Australia (Barkoczy, 2015). Application It is apparent from the discussion above that Sam is a foreign tax resident for FY2015 and FY2016. Hence, in line with Section 6-5(3), he would be liable to pay tax only on any income that he would have derived from Australia. Any income from foreign sources would be exempt from tax in Australia. It is apparent that the contract income for soccer is derived from Italy and hence would be foreign source income which is not taxable in Australia as per the relevant rules. However, it is also known that Sam has a property in Australia which has been rented. The rent income is derived from Australia only and hence would be taxable in Australia. Conclusion Sam would be considered a foreign tax resident for FY2015 and FY2016. As, Sam is a foreign tax resident for the given time period, hence only the rent income derived from property located in Australia would be taxable at the hands of Australian tax authorities. References ATO 1991, IT 2650, Australian Taxation Office, [Online] Available at https://law.ato.gov.au/atolaw/view.htm?Docid=ITR/IT2650/NAT/ATO/00001 [Accessed March 30, 2017] Barkoczy,S. 2015, Foundation of Taxation Law 2015, 7th ed., North Ryde: CCH Publications CCH 2013, Australian Master Tax Guide 2013, 51st ed., Sydney: Wolters Kluwer Deutsch, R., Freizer, M., Fullerton, I., Hanley, P., and Snape, T. 2015, Australian tax handbook 8th ed., Pymont: Thomson Reuters, Gilders, F., Taylor, J., Walpole, M., Burton, M. and Ciro, T. 2016, Understanding taxation law 2016, 9th ed., Sydney: LexisNexis/Butterworths. Nethercott, L., Richardson, G. and Devos, K. 2016, Australian Taxation Study Manual 2016, 4th ed., Sydney: Oxford University Press Sadiq, K, Coleman, C, Hanegbi, R, Jogarajan, S, Krever, R, Obst, W, and Ting, A 2016 ,Principles of Taxation Law 2016, 8th ed., Pymont:Thomson Reuters